Test Interpretation Dyson Analysis – Terry Dyson, Analyst |
||
|
Suzuki/Cycle-Rx test A: pre RX 2000, B: Cycle-Rx Clean 1000, C:Cycle-Rx clean 1500, D: post Cycle-Rx rinse 2000, E: Amsoil Synthetic 2000, mileage intervals. Protocol: Customer controlled the operating, sampling, and servicing a well maintained Amsoil 10W-40 lubricated, Fram oil filtered, K&N air filtered, Amoco 93 octane fueled, 1996 Suzuki RF900R. Bike operated primarily at East cost of
During the A pre-cleaning, B & C cleaning, and D rinse phases, Suzuki OEM 10W-40 motor cycle oil was used. The E, 2000 mile interval was Amsoil alone. |
||
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Water none at each interval | Coolant none at each interval | Fuel none at each interval | ||
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Large Particle Detection Counts: | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Conclusion: Cycle-RX cleaning was significant while not increasing wear rates in the common trans/engine sump. Significant drop in wear values is indicated from data. Transmission was cleaned dramatically and surprised the testers with the level of particles scavenged. Until the Cycle-Rx test and cleaning the bike has had an exclusive lubricant diet of Amsoil. Another good reason to do periodic cleaning with the Cycle-RX product, regardless of oil brand or chemistry used. Waiting till 60,000 miles on the Odometer is too long!
|
||